Re: Does NM start named?
- From: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- To: Matthew Saltzman <mjs ces clemson edu>
- Cc: Neal Becker <ndbecker2 gmail com>, networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Does NM start named?
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:53:09 -0400
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 11:56 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> >> In Fedora, you start named at boot, but to get it to talk to NM, you need
> >> to connect it to dbus. Add to /etc/sysconfig/named the line
> >> OPTIONS="-D"
> >> Also, do not install the bind-chroot package, but do install the
> >> caching-nameserver package.
> > Why not install bind-chroot?
> IIRC, NM won't work with a chrooted named. If things have changed, maybe
> a developer could comment.
As long as dbus can get out of the chroot, it should work, but there are
some configuration options that aren't usually set in the default
bind-chroot packages. Essentially, if you want out-of-the-box setup,
you install caching-nameserver and you're good to go.
Or, don't use bind at all. If you're not running bind, NM should write
the correct values to /etc/resolv.conf, otherwise it's a bug. Of
course, that requires that DHCP works.
] [Thread Prev