dnscache
- From: Christopher Aillon <caillon redhat com>
- To: networkmanager list <networkmanager-list gnome org>
- Subject: dnscache
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:08:33 -0400
Have we looked at using dnscache[1] for our caching nameserver? It
seems more lightweight than using bind (without its track record even!)
and seems like exactly what we would want. I haven't looked too much in
detail at it (or bind for that matter), but I think its worth
considering. I wonder if we would get more widespread adoption for it.
[1] http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]