Re: signedness of wireless keys.



On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 14:17 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
> 
> > In linux with gcc we'll always get 8-bits, and we don't really (or at
> > least shouldn't) care which sign it is, so we should always use "char
> > *", and let the compiler figure out which sign is which.
> 
> This is fine with me, and a lot easier to fix.  char* it is.

+1





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]