Re: signedness of wireless keys.

[Peter Jones <pjones redhat com>]

On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 11:02 -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> Just a thought, as we move to libnm-util, we should settle on a
> signedness of the char* we use for wireless keys.  Sometimes we use
> char*, sometimes we use unsigned char*.  But the bigger problem is that
> we mix the types via e.g. return values.
> 
> You can see all of the mismatches if you turn on the appropriate compile
> flags.
> 
> Signed or unsigned?

Unsigned.

-- 
  Peter