Jonathon Jongsma scrisse: > This sounds fine to me. However, the .README file suggests that if > the commit fixes a particular bug number, the summary line should be: > > #123445 - description goes here > > Unfortunately that won't work since git treats any line with a > leading # as a comment line, so we'll need to make sure we don't use > the # in front of the bug number (or change the policy to put the bug > number at the end of the line or something) It is quite common to use the format: * Many many changes (Closes: #xxx) where "Closes" may varies to distinguish between different bucktrackers (eg. LP for ubuntu bugtracker, and such). May I suggest it to adopt it? Ciao, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso) : :' : The Universal O.S. | lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Attachment:
pgpuMlpzE8BLw.pgp
Description: PGP signature