Re: maybe a gsoc project?
- From: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- To: b0unc3 <daniele maio gmail com>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: maybe a gsoc project?
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:10:05 +0200
Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 20:04 +0200 schrieb b0unc3:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
> Hej hej,
>
> I know I'm picky, anyway: Can you please avoid top postings?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Sorry :(
>
>
>
>
> Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 19:06 +0200 schrieb b0unc3:
> > however, the way nautilus do FTP is exactly the contrary
> that I want
> > to do, for this reason I talk about simplicity and
> quickness.
> > For example the way nautilus uses to do a simple file upload
> on an FTP
> > Server is far away (imho) from to be quick and maybe also
> simple.
>
>
> You've posted two screenshot mockups of your ideas, but they
> don't
> explain how and where I set up the FTP address after clicking
> "FTP
> Server" or where I define my Flickr account.
> And what if I have more than one FTP server? "Quick uploads"
> also
> doesn't mean much to me as a context menu item. Maybe "Upload
> file(s) to
> a server".
>
>
> Uhm... I will try to explain what's on my mind a little bit more.
> Take for example an FTP upload.
> The steps I want to reproduce are :
> 1) select the file(s) you want to upload
> 2) select "quick uploads" (or better "Upload file(s) to a
> server...") and choose the service
> 3) insert informations (address, directory where to save
> and eventually the new name of the file on the server) or get it from
> a previous saved bookmark
...and if we get a dialog here like the current FTP dialog in nautilus,
we haven't gained that much. Hence I'd appreciate another mockup. :)
Nautilus also has "File -> Connect to Server". I wonder if adding
bookmark functionality here wouldn't be sufficient.
andre
> 4) click ok, and you are done.
>
> Well, for managing more ftp servers or more account, I think to add a
> "bookmarks" functionality to the extension so you don't need to
> re-insert static information for each upload.
>
>
>
>
> > By now I'm deeply looking at Coundit, and on a first
> impression it
> > seems to be oriented in a too different (an more complex)
> way that I
> > need.
>
>
> Well, the other way round I can ask "How extensible is your
> proposal"? :)
> I just would like to avoid duplicating code that already
> exists and
> could be used, e.g. in Conduit...
>
> At the moment I don't know "how extensible" my proposal can be. I'm
> agree on the code reuse, and of course, if I can take some parts from
> Conduit (or better, use their api) I will do that.
>
>
>
>
>
> andre
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Andre Klapper
> <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
> > Hej hej Daniele,
> >
> > feel free to move this back to the mailinglist.
> >
> > Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 18:06 +0200 schrieb
> b0unc3:
> > > at the moment I cannot found out how nautilus do
> FTP (is
> > this an
> > > extension ?).
> >
> >
> > 1. nautilus --browser
> > 2. control+l
> > 3. Enter ftp://ftp.gnome.org
> >
> > > On the other hand I have looked out at Conduit and
> it do
> > very nice
> > > stuff, but I think I little be different from what
> I want to
> > do.
> > > Principally because many users don't want to take
> care of
> > sync, and
> > > need only to upload random files at random places
> (this is
> > my point of
> > > view of course).
> >
> >
> > ...and the Conduit code is not helpful to use for
> that?
> >
> >
> > > I did some pictures on how my idea should become.
> > > The [1] is how to make a quick and simple upload
> way (imho),
> > after a
> > > simple gui starts [2] and takes care of the rest.
> > > I hope I've been more exhaustive , and you have
> got the
> > point.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Daniele.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://picasaweb.google.com/daniele.maio/NautilusExtension#5319012064624824930
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
> http://picasaweb.google.com/daniele.maio/NautilusExtension#5319012073506650114
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Andre Klapper
> > <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:26 +0200, b0unc3
> wrote:
> > > > I have an idea in my mind. I would like
> to develop
> > an
> > > extension for
> > > > nautilus that can allow users to simply
> and
> > quickly upload
> > > file(s) to
> > > > remote service(s). Remote service can be
> an FTP
> > Server or an
> > > SSH
> > > > Server and make also possible to upload
> to online
> > service
> > > like Flickr,
> > > > YouTube , picasaweb and so on.
> > > > I'd like to know from you if it can be
> considered
> > for a GSoC
> > > project.
> > > > Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > FTP is already possible in nautilus - what
> is bad
> > about the
> > > current
> > > implementation, or why is it currently not
> "simple
> > and quick"
> > > from your
> > > point of view?
> > >
> > > In general: Conduit is a blessed
> dependency of GNOME
> > and
> > > provides a
> > > framework for parts of this (e.g. picasa,
> flickr
> > etc), see
> > > http://live.gnome.org/Conduit for more
> information.
> > >
> > > andre
> > > --
> > > mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
> > > http://www.iomc.de/ |
> > http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
> > http://www.iomc.de/ |
> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
> >
> >
> >
>
> > --
> > nautilus-list mailing list
> > nautilus-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
> --
>
> mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
> http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
>
>
>
--
mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
