Re: Possible speed enhancement
- From: Xavier Bestel <xavier bestel free fr>
- To: Jisakiel <jisakiel yahoo es>
- Cc: john bester attix5 com, nautilus-list gnome org, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Possible speed enhancement
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:01:12 +0200
> De: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
> On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 15:20 +0200, John Bester wrote:
>
> > Nautilus takes about 8 seconds to load up /usr/lib on my current PC
> > (about 2,300 files). KDE/dolphin takes about 2 seconds.
>
> This again... The reason things like /usr/bin and /usr/lib are slow are
> that these are large directories where almost no files have an
> extension. This means we have to sniff the file type by reading the
> first bit of all files. Reading lots of files is inherently slow due to
> the mechanical motion required for seeks on a harddrive.
>
> That some other apps choose not to sniff such files makes them faster
> for /usr/lib and /usr/bin, but they miss showing file types on some
> files. This is a design decision for nautilus, which is not mainly
> designed to read /usr/bin, but rather to manage users normal files
> (which generally have extensions).
Maybe the x bit should count as a '.exe' extension (sort of) ?
Xav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]