Re: Update to new emblem sizes

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:02 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 24/07/2007 alle 11.48 +0200, Alexander Larsson ha
> scritto:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 10:35 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> > > Il giorno lun, 23/07/2007 alle 16.21 +0200, Alexander Larsson ha
> > > scritto:
> > > > On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 17:46 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > > Alex, honestly I agree with the idea to have, for example, 22x22 pixels
> > > icons under 22x22/<role>/ directories, at least from icon designer/theme
> > > creator point of view.
> > 
> > So, what pixel size should nautilus use for emblems for e.g. 48x48? If I
> > have to hardcode a size (or more useful, a percentage of the full icon
> > size), what should it be?
> 
> Currently gnome-icon-theme is following tango guidelines, i.e. is
> providing icons at 16, 22, 24 and 32 pixels (plus, of course, 48x48
> pixels but using SVG). Some emblems should be available at 8x8 pixels
> too.
> 
> Maybe something like this could work
> 
> Zoom  |  Icon size  | Emblem size
> 100%  |    48       |   32
>  75%  |    32       |   22/24
>  50%  |    22/24    |   16
>  25%  |    16       |    8

Looking at the current gnome-icon-theme there are still 32x32 icons in
the 48x48/emblems folder. Like for instance emblem-danger.png.

It seems hard to do something sane when we're doing a little bit of both
here... 

Also, this emblem size change will "break" everyones custom installed
emblems.