Re: nautilus-list Digest, Vol 33, Issue 12
- From: Will Farrington <wcfarrington gmail com>
- To: nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: nautilus-list Digest, Vol 33, Issue 12
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:07:10 -0500
Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:13:46 +0100
> From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
> Subject: Re: Desktop Icons
> To: Will Farrington <a simple facade gmail com>
> Cc: nautilus-list gnome org
> Message-ID: <1168514026 7384 141 camel greebo>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 00:23 -0500, Will Farrington wrote:
> > I'm going to, within the next few days, make a specification on the Bug
> > Tracker concerning desktop icons.
> >
> > With scalable icons commonplace in icon sets these days, the size of
> > icons on the desktop shouldn't be enforced by tedious resizing by hand.
> >
> > There ought to be a gconf option (along with a given place somewhere in
> > a settings dialog) to determine the default size of desktop icons.
> >
> > Thoughts, concerns, opinions?
>
> The desktop icon size is currently related to the default zoom level in
> a slighly strange fashion. But you can sort of set it.
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
> alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
> He's an impetuous skateboarding vampire hunter whom everyone believes is mad.
> She's an enchanted hypochondriac archaeologist who hides her beauty behind a
> pair of thick-framed spectacles. They fight crime!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
This is a usability issue. There's a big difference between having large
desktop launchers and having to use large icons in general file
management.
This option should be set by other means. =)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]