Re: another crasher blocker bug in sight



On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 17:53 +0100, guenther wrote:
> Welcome to bugsquad hell.
> 
> > can somebody please take a look at
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373730 and
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372471 ?
> > (probably the same issue.)
> > 
> > pretty new bug (filed four days ago), 42 duplicates in four days (and
> > that's why i'm posting to this list - this is another blocker rising
> > up), and all duplicates coming from Fedora Core 6.
> > 
> > CRITICAL **: nautilus_directory_ref: assertion
> > `NAUTILUS_IS_DIRECTORY (directory)' failed
> 
> Also see bug 373294 [1]. Fedora only (yet?), same assertion. More than
> 40 reports in a whopping 2 days.
> 
> Note that both these bugs have been added to the auto-stacktrace-reject
> list. This is a counter measure to stop the flood. However, please note
> that this effectively means there will be no new duplicates, which
> limits the ability to ask for more info and better traces. If you do
> need this, feel free to contact me directly.
> 
> No new duplicates does *not* mean this bug to be magically fixed.
> 
> Due to the enormous workload such duplicate magnets are to the bugsquad,
> these bugs should stay on the reject list. However, I can easily respond
> to each new (rejected) duplicate with a custom mail, asking for a better
> stacktrace, if need be.

I've got it fixed in CVS. I'll do an FC6 update today.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl redhat com    alla lysator liu se 
He's a time-tossed crooked romance novelist looking for 'the Big One.' She's a 
pregnant paranoid bounty hunter living on borrowed time. They fight crime! 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]