Am Donnerstag, den 18.08.2005, 00:37 +0200 schrieb Mateusz Łoskot: > - Alex - napisał(a): > >>From: Manuel Amador <rudd-o amautacorp com> > >>Subject: Re: commander > > > > > >>Because it conflicts with the design goals for Nautilus. > > > > [...] > > I would like to ask the developers, if they decide to exclude a > "commander" > > option for nautilus to do a poll first. OK, every admin loves midnight commander. It simply rocks. We could add a new NautilusWindow subclass having two views and such, but it would simply suck, because we don't have all these cool extra caps (quick view etc.). Adding this just for the sake of an admin mode would definitly bloat Nautilus. Also, most users IMHO will not get along with an MC look&feel. We don't target geeks but grandmas, that's the truth. What you want is simply another tool. > As I said, I considered joining to gnome commander or tux commander > project, but I'd join Nautilus to develop features adding > "commander-like" behaviour. I haven't tried gnome-commander for a while. Last time I used it (around 2.0 or 2.2), it had many deprecated widgets. The solution to your problem is to give the gnome-commander development momentum it lacks. PS: I don't see any reason for having an mc GUI just like there is no reason for having a vim GUI. -- Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part