Re: .jpg thumbnailing

[Gábor Farkas <gabor z10n net>]

Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 00:44 +0200, Gábor Farkas wrote:
>
> > Alexander Larsson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 16:27 +0200, Kotrla Vitezslav wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > I was thinking about this one before, but just today found courage
> > > > to ask. It seems like Nautilus is using two different approaches
> > > > to thumbnailing .jpg pictures. Please see attached file, paying 
> > > > attention to different thumbnail sizes.
> > > >
> > > > I just wonder what is the reason behind and how can I get consistent
> > > > thumbnailing [I prefer the nice bordered and shadowed one :-)]
> > >
> > >
> > > This is for all files. Very small files are not thumbnailed, but instead
> > > the file itself is used as the thumbnail. 
> >
> > i am not sure if this is the problem.
> >
> > i also have this problem, please see the following screenshot
> > (it was too big to attach):
> >
> > http://z10n.net/nautilus.png
> >
> > as you can see, two pictures have VERY small thumbnails...
> >
> > but those small thumbnails are not the files themselves.
> > they are much larger:
> >
> > darkelf.png: 193 x 300
> > lineage2_darkelf_1.jpg: 438 x 484
> >
> > and they still have very small thumbnails..
> >
> > if someone wants to test those files, they can be found here:
> >
> > http://z10n.net/darkelf.png
> > http://z10n.net/lineage2_darkelf_1.jpg
>
>
> When i say small, i mean file size in bytes. Not resolution.

sorry, but i don't really understand what you're saying...

you're saying that what i described here, is a different problem.
am i correct?

thanks,
gabor