Re: .jpg thumbnailing



Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 00:44 +0200, Gábor Farkas wrote:

Alexander Larsson wrote:

On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 16:27 +0200, Kotrla Vitezslav wrote:


I was thinking about this one before, but just today found courage
to ask. It seems like Nautilus is using two different approaches
to thumbnailing .jpg pictures. Please see attached file, paying attention to different thumbnail sizes.

I just wonder what is the reason behind and how can I get consistent
thumbnailing [I prefer the nice bordered and shadowed one :-)]


This is for all files. Very small files are not thumbnailed, but instead
the file itself is used as the thumbnail.

i am not sure if this is the problem.

i also have this problem, please see the following screenshot
(it was too big to attach):

http://z10n.net/nautilus.png

as you can see, two pictures have VERY small thumbnails...

but those small thumbnails are not the files themselves.
they are much larger:

darkelf.png: 193 x 300
lineage2_darkelf_1.jpg: 438 x 484

and they still have very small thumbnails..

if someone wants to test those files, they can be found here:

http://z10n.net/darkelf.png
http://z10n.net/lineage2_darkelf_1.jpg


When i say small, i mean file size in bytes. Not resolution.

sorry, but i don't really understand what you're saying...

you're saying that what i described here, is a different problem.
am i correct?

thanks,
gabor



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]