Re: .jpg thumbnailing
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Gábor Farkas <gabor z10n net>
- Cc: Kotrla Vitezslav <kotrla ceb cz>, Nautilus <nautilus-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: .jpg thumbnailing
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:10:47 +0200
On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 00:44 +0200, Gábor Farkas wrote:
> Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 16:27 +0200, Kotrla Vitezslav wrote:
> >
> >>I was thinking about this one before, but just today found courage
> >>to ask. It seems like Nautilus is using two different approaches
> >>to thumbnailing .jpg pictures. Please see attached file, paying
> >>attention to different thumbnail sizes.
> >>
> >>I just wonder what is the reason behind and how can I get consistent
> >>thumbnailing [I prefer the nice bordered and shadowed one :-)]
> >
> >
> > This is for all files. Very small files are not thumbnailed, but instead
> > the file itself is used as the thumbnail.
>
> i am not sure if this is the problem.
>
> i also have this problem, please see the following screenshot
> (it was too big to attach):
>
> http://z10n.net/nautilus.png
>
> as you can see, two pictures have VERY small thumbnails...
>
> but those small thumbnails are not the files themselves.
> they are much larger:
>
> darkelf.png: 193 x 300
> lineage2_darkelf_1.jpg: 438 x 484
>
> and they still have very small thumbnails..
>
> if someone wants to test those files, they can be found here:
>
> http://z10n.net/darkelf.png
> http://z10n.net/lineage2_darkelf_1.jpg
When i say small, i mean file size in bytes. Not resolution.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
He's a witless pirate vagrant searching for his wife's true killer. She's a
time-travelling tomboy hooker with a flame-thrower. They fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]