El lun, 17-05-2004 a las 14:45, Thorsten Wilms escribió: > On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 02:16:05PM -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > > > How about a dialog like this: > > > > [ ] Server requires username and password: > > Username: __________ > > Password: __________ > > [ Cancel] [ Login ] > > > > If the "Server requires username and password" is unchecked, then the > > username and password fields are insensitive. > > > It doesn't make clear the alternative is anonymous login. > It feels like asking the user if the server requires username/password. > But the app should know that ... Fact is, the app cannot know that. This is exactly why we're having this discussion thread. > The wording "requires" is misleading, because it can be just an option. > > And it requires one extra click (the checkmark) for non-anonymous. > > The dialog must have 2 textfileds and 2 buttons (Cancel, Login). > And something for anonymous login. Using a button has the advantage > of direct action / least number of clicks required. > > > --- > Thorsten Wilms -- Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) GPG key ID: 0xC1033CAD at keyserver.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente