Re: Some examples of sniffing usefulness



El mar, 20-01-2004 a las 03:42, Heinrich Rebehn escribió:
> > 
> I have different expiriences. Opening a folder with 8,000 jpg images in 
> nautilus takes ages, because *every* file in the folder is *opened* 
> (although the icons have already been created) which would not be 
> necessary if mimetype was detected by extension.

The thing is, the extensions are a problem, both theoretically and
practically (we've all seen how users of Other Operating Systems get
bitten by this often  - may I say "e-mail worm"?).  What is needed is a
trustable, dependable, architecturally integrated way of storing what
type is a file, instead of sniffing either extensions or content.  This
was standardized to be EAs, with implementations now popping up.

Abandoning file extensions and sniffing will take a lot of thinking out
of the box.  For once, let's do something right, instead of trying to
band-aid our way around others' stupid design mistakes (MS-DOS).

> So both ways have their pros and cons and i think the most important 
> thing is that the user stays in cotrol, that is mimetype detection 
> method should be a configurable item!
> 
> Heinrich
> -- 
> 
> Heinrich Rebehn
> 
> University of Bremen
> Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering
> - Department of Telecommunications -
> 
> Phone : +49/421/218-4664
> Fax   :            -3341
-- 
	Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
	GPG key ID: 0xC1033CAD at keyserver.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]