Re: Proposal for bug 73937 / symlinks in nautilus
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: Alfons Hoogervorst <alfons proteus demon nl>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal for bug 73937 / symlinks in nautilus
- Date: 13 Jan 2003 17:40:29 -0800
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 14:33, Alfons Hoogervorst wrote:
> Lo Ettore,
>
> On 13-01-03 (Mon) 17:26 -0500 Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
> wrote:
>
> | > Syslinks are not windows shorcuts. They are entities in themselves
> | > and should be treated as such.
> |
> | I can't see any difference between a Windows shortcut and a Unix
> | symlink; could you please elaborate?
>
> Think PIF file. Now transfer everything you know about PIF (minus the
> 386 protected mode stuff you were always scared of), wrap them in an OLE
> stream, and you have something that looks like a Windows shortcut.
>
> It's just a file with launch parameters, not unlike the launchers in KDE
> and GNOME.
Technical implementation is mostly irrelevant here. What matters is that
shortcuts in Windows *to the user* work very much like symlinks.
-Seth
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]