Re: [gnome-love] Re: Retiring bugs - or - guilty until provent innocent?
- From: John Fleck <jfleck inkstain net>
- To: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- Cc: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Darryl Rees <rees netnam vn>, gnome-love gnome org, nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gnome-love] Re: Retiring bugs - or - guilty until provent innocent?
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:55:23 -0700
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:52:40AM -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> >
> > Some bugs are really bizzare and only show up on some architectures,
> > compiler versions, library versions, or just in very uncommon situations.
> > Fixing these bugs are really important, as they are the kind of bugs that
> > make the system "feel unstable". It is important that bugs like that are
> > not closed.
> >
My attitude is that the time lost in accidentally closing a "real" bug is far
less than the time lost in keeping a bunch of "not-real" bugs open on the off
chance that one of them might be real.
If the bug is real and we inappropriately close it, it'll quickly either be
reopened by the original filer or a new one will be filed by someone else. I
waste a lot of my bugzilla time just looking at the same bugs over and over
again and wondering, "Gee, I wonder if I should close that?"
Cheers,
John
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]