Re: Retiring bugs - or - guilty until provent innocent?
- From: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- To: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: Darryl Rees <rees netnam vn>, gnome-love gnome org, nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Retiring bugs - or - guilty until provent innocent?
- Date: 06 Feb 2003 10:52:40 -0500
Basically, 'what Alex said.' I'm going to be sending a more general
email on this topic to desktop-devel and gnome-hackers today, as well.
Luis [and bugsquad, of course. :)
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 08:57, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Darryl Rees wrote:
>
> > Dear Luis et al,
> >
> > There are bugs (often build bugs, for eg.) that previously i was able to
> > duplicate, but subsequently have not been able to duplicate for several
> > months.
>
> Build bugs that are old and have no comments for a while can certainly be
> closed if they work for you now. Unless its a really uncommon architecture
> the bug will be quickly filed again in the rare case its not actually fixed.
>
> > Obviously 'works for me now :-)' is not a reasonable premise for
> > retiring a bug, but in many cases it feels like these were short-term
> > transient bugs and that there's little utility to retaining them as
> > unresolved bugs in bugzilla.
> >
> > Is there anything that can be done to help clean out such bugs; if
> > nobody has commented on them for a few months, can somebody add 'haven't
> > seen this for a few months now' or something like that?
>
> Some bugs are really bizzare and only show up on some architectures,
> compiler versions, library versions, or just in very uncommon situations.
> Fixing these bugs are really important, as they are the kind of bugs that
> make the system "feel unstable". It is important that bugs like that are
> not closed.
>
> However, if the bug was easy to reproduce and now works for you I think
> its fine to just change the bug to "NEEDINFO" and ask the reporter if he
> still sees the bug in the newest version. If there is no reply in a few
> weeks its ok to just mark it FIXED.
>
> Of course, there is always special cases. Use your judgement.
>
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
> alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
> He's an uncontrollable amnesiac vampire hunter who knows the secret of the
> alien invasion. She's a time-travelling Buddhist magician's assistant who
> hides her beauty behind a pair of thick-framed spectacles. They fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]