RE: Column View
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: Calum Benson Sun COM
- Cc: totierney yahoo com, diskzero mac com, nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: Column View
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:42:36 +0100
Calum wrote:
> > I'd love to hear about some user studies. If Apple did them then I
> > hope there is some information about them out there. Personally, I
> > don't believe that Apple do user studies anymore, or they don't do
> > them like they used to.
>
> About ten years back when I was working on a styleguide for
> Reuters, we did a study of trees v. column views for
> navigating hierarchical geographic information
> (continent->country->city, more or less).
>
> Our target audience (stock traders and fund managers) found
> the browsers easier to use, but we only tested hierarchies
> that were three or four levels deep (hence no horizontal
> scrolling), since that's all they ever had to deal with.
> Unfortunately I've long since lost contact with any report we
> wrote about it though. It's probably also true that tree
> controls were fairly novel in those days compared to flat
> lists, regular computer users will likely have had much more
> exposure to trees nowadays, although they're not inherently
> any easier to use than they were in those days.
In case it's interesting, I remembered the other thing that confused me - I
didn't see the connection between the selected item in one column and the
consequent extra columns to the right of it. I was particularly confused
when everything seemed to change and shift around completely when I selected
a different item in one of the columns in the middle. I might have figured
it out more quickly if I had been familiar with the default MacOS X file
structure.
For me, the connection is clearer in a tree because the child folders are
under the parent.
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]