Re: [Usability]Dealing with files in Gnome
- From: Wesley Leggette <wleggette gate net>
- To: Reinout van Schouwen <reinout cs vu nl>
- Cc: usability gnome org, nautilus-list gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]Dealing with files in Gnome
- Date: 01 Apr 2003 17:55:38 -0600
Hello Reinout,
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 03:38, Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
> Hello Wesley,
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2003, Wesley Leggette wrote:
>
> > Regarding Pick up and drop, I think the semantics are no better. What
> > happens if you "pick up" one object, then another, and then drop? It
>
> The way this ought to work is to let it be impossible to pick up more than
> one object (or group of objects) at a time.
That would be simpler, although some sort of walking bag trick would be
fun (but maybe a bit impractical).
>
> > would work this same way, the change in terminology is pointless. We all
> > know what cut, copy, and paste mean and it's more than logical to assume
> > our users do to.
>
> I'd wager to guess most of "our users" are familiar with editing
> operations in the context of word processing. But I highly doubt this is
> the case for file management - stretching the cut/copy/paste metaphor to
> that area was, IMHO, silly to begin with.
On a theoretical standpoint I agree with what you're saying, but it
seems like a drastic move for such a small thing unless people are
actually having problems handling the metaphor. Do you see this
happening where you are?
>
> > it's different that traditional cut and paste, the name change would be
> > appropriate. And hey, we could always have a preferences toggle between
> > the two modes of operation.
>
> A pref for this would just shove the problem on the users' plate, and we'd
> still be arguing which mode is to be made the default one.
so true.
>
> regards,
--
Wesley Leggette <wleggette gate net>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]