Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome
- From: Reginald Melchisedek Poyau <melchisedek earthlink net>
- To: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: Dave Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>, nautilus-list gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome
- Date: 28 Jun 2002 22:46:18 -0400
On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 13:11, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2002, Dave Bordoley wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 12:33, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > >
> > > There is already one place where you can reach everything else,
> > > start-here:. There will never be "only one place". I mean, there are
> > > subdirs to applications:// that are other places.
> >
> > No right now there are four seperate uris that are used to launch apps
> > (applications://, preferences://, system-settings://,
> > server-settings://) I meant one central starting point for launching
> > applications in nautilus (of course users should be able to do whatever
> > they want ,adding launcher to directories etc., but we should try to
> > create a consistent easy to use default).
>
> Why do you think the name preferences:// is so completely different than
> applications://preferences to the user? The way you navigate it in the UI
> is exactly the same: (1) go to toplevel place, (2) click on preferences
> icon. The only thing you seem to gain by applications://preferences is to
> tell the user that preferences is an application.
>
> What if the toplevel would be start-here: and applications a true subdir.
> start-here://applications. That would be the same as you would want. I
> don't see why the URIs matter at all to the users, and if they did, i'd
> prefer the simpler preferences: than toplevel-something://preferences for
> the few times you wanted to type it.
>
> > > > This is similar to mac finder in osx. There is one directory where all
> > > > apps (including the macs version of the control-center) is launched
> > > > from. I think having doubled functionality is confusing. I'm not the
> > > > only one either...
> > >
> > > Yes. In gnome this is start-here.
> >
> > No it isn't, it's applications://. (That was the whole point of the
> > vfolder method right, lets us created this one location for launching
> > all apps that is not hardcoded to a central location though).
>
> That was not the point at all of vfolders. The point of vfolders is that
> the menus can be merged from several places so that installation of menu
> entries by third party applications would be simpler, but yet controllable
> by the sysadmin/distro creator.
>
> > > So you want to expose the fact to users that our settings dialogs are in
> > > fact applications?
> >
> > Seth already made this decision when he put preferences in the
> > applications menu (and therefore in the applications:// directory).
> >
> > (applications://Preferences, applications://system)
>
> And I must say I disagree with this decision, since they were already put
> somewhere else before that. That decision was already made before seth
> made his decision, if that matters.
>
> I would prefer if e.g. "desktop preferences" were part of the toplevel
> gnome menu rather than under applications, since I'm not sure at all that
> people will look under applications when they browse the menu looking for
> where to change the font. Of course they'll quickly learn that the fact
> that the submenu is called applications doesn't mean anything, and in fact
> whatever you want to do it's the menu to look in (unless you want to take
> a screenshot, which for some unknown reason has been decided is more
> worthy than e.g. preferences of a top-level menu entry).
Exactly!!! . I find it to be extremely counter intuitive to place
System/Desktop preferences/settings under the Applications menu.
Why not simply add a Preferences/Settings toplevel menu to the menu bar.
I think the menu as it stands is a total mess. I mean it is like
someone decided ( they did ) to just throw everything under
applications://
Examples:
applications://help ? how does this make sense?
applications://"Home Folder" ? what is that about?
I think that Start-Here:// would have been a better choice, but hey that
is just my opinion.
Start-here://help this is much better right?
Start-here://"Home Folder"
Start-here://Applications
Start-here://Preferences/Desktop
Start-here://Preferences/System
Start-here://Games I don't think that "games" belongs under
applications://
>
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
> alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
> He's a lounge-singing alcoholic master criminal haunted by an iconic dead
> American confidante She's a mentally unstable mute museum curator with the
> power to bend men's minds. They fight crime!
>
> --
> nautilus-list mailing list
> nautilus-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]