Re: [Fwd: [Bug 83331] Changed - [Solaris] Hardware view crashes]



I didn't remember this feature :-)

I just test it in my laptop and it says that I have "0 CPUs", funny :-)

A suggestion... Could we add a link to the "hardware:" view in
start-here: view? I think that we don't have any link to that view...


Cheers.

El jue, 06-06-2002 a las 13:49, Michael Meeks escribió:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> 	Hardware view - who was supposed to be saving this from being axed ?
> why is it still causing problem on other platforms ?
> 
> 	Can we get rid of it - or add some anal 'linux only' check to
> configure.in to close the bug ? I'll hack up a linux detection thing I
> think.
> 
> 	Regards,
> 
> 		Michael.
> 
> -- 
>  mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
> ----
> 

> From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
> To: nautilus-maint bugzilla gnome org, anand subra wipro com, nautilus-qa-maint bugzilla gnome org
> Cc: gnome-bugs wipro com, michael ximian com
> Subject: [Bug 83331] Changed - [Solaris] Hardware view crashes
> Date: 05 Jun 2002 07:59:16 -0400
> 
> Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
> URL shown below and enter your comments there.
> 
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83331
> 
> Changed by louie ximian com 
> 
> --- shadow/83331	Wed May 29 00:23:32 2002
> +++ shadow/83331.tmp.19604	Wed Jun  5 07:59:16 2002
> @@ -3,19 +3,20 @@
>  Version: cvs (head)
>  OS: Solaris
>  OS Details: 
>  Status: NEW   
>  Resolution: 
>  Severity: critical
> -Priority: Normal
> +Priority: High
>  Component: View as (Other)
>  AssignedTo: nautilus-maint bugzilla gnome org                            
>  ReportedBy: anand subra wipro com               
>  QAContact: nautilus-qa-maint bugzilla gnome org
>  TargetMilestone: ---
>  URL: 
> +Cc: gnome-bugs wipro com,michael ximian com
>  Summary: [Solaris] Hardware view crashes
>  
>  A similar unconfirmed bug for hardware view crash exists as bug #61925. 
>  But this bug is on Solaris and also for a very recent version of nautilus. 
>  Moreover the stack traces are different.
>  
> @@ -65,6 +66,9 @@
>  #23 0xfe5a0cc8 in gtk_main () from /opt/gnome-2.0/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
>  #24 0xff36e3e0 in nautilus_view_standard_main_multi ()
>     from /opt/gnome-2.0/lib/libnautilus.so.2
>  #25 0xff36e9a0 in nautilus_view_standard_main ()
>     from /opt/gnome-2.0/lib/libnautilus.so.2
>  #26 0x16724 in main ()
> +
> +------- Additional Comments From louie ximian com  2002-06-05 07:59 -------
> +Michael: should be a quick fix for you, maybe?
> 
-- 
Carlos Perelló Marín
mailto:carlos gnome-db org
mailto:carlos perello hispalinux es
http://www.gnome-db.org
http://www.Hispalinux.es
Valencia - Spain

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje esta firmada digitalmente



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]