Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: [GNOME VFS] EOG instead of nautilus-image-viewer
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>
- Cc: GNOME VFS <gnome-vfs ximian com>, Jens Finke <jens triq net>, Nautilus <nautilus-list lists eazel com>
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: [GNOME VFS] EOG instead of nautilus-image-viewer
- Date: 04 Feb 2002 15:21:00 +0000
Hi Darin,
On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 05:25, Darin Adler wrote:
> On 2/2/02 6:28 PM, "Michael Meeks" <michael ximian com> wrote:
> >> Any features in the Nautilus viewer that the EOG one does not have?
> >
> > Not as far as I am aware.
>
> I think I'm going to start getting bug reports about Nautilus being
> unable to open images from people who have Nautilus installed but
> not EOG.
Well - EOG is a part of the core platform - as is Nautilus, so this
shouldn't be a problem.
> I think that the Nautilus viewer has features that the EOG one does
> not, but they are ones you are not yet aware of.
So you say; I can't authoritatively swear that that is the case - since
I can't be bothered to do a line by line review; suffice it to say that
I substantially wrote both the nautilus image-viewer [ forked from
bonobo ] - and that it's aweful code, in contrast the EOG control is far
better, more featureful - and having two versions of the same thing -
one badly cut down is not optimal.
> I think that allowing users to choose interpolation options is a bizarre
> excess feature for a simple image viewer, and will probably confuse the
> people who notice it, but few are likely to notice it.
:-)
> I'm not sure what a "grab handle" is, but I think it's strange to have a
> extra scrolling UI in the image viewer as that doesn't work in any of the
> other Nautilus views.
True - but it's dead useful as you can see from the plaudits.
> I think it's strange that this thread is not in the Nautilus list, because
> many of the interested people don't subscribe to the gnome-vfs list, and
> this change won't have any effect on other gnome-vfs users, despite it being
> a change in the gnome-mime-data package.
Oh - well; I'm most happy to discuss it where you like - I understood
you agreed in principal anyway so ... I just need maintainer approval.
> But despite thinking these things, I also think it's OK to delete the
> Nautilus viewer and start using the EOG one; it's nice to have less code
> total in Gnome 2.
Wonderful - may I commit the change to gnome-mime-data in which case ?
[ and the corresponding Nautilus removal ]
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]