Re: POTFILES.in changes
- From: Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
- To: Christian Rose <menthos menthos com>
- Cc: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>, nautilus-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: POTFILES.in changes
- Date: 18 Dec 2002 12:50:33 +0100
Am Mit, 2002-12-18 um 10.27 schrieb Christian Rose:
> ons 2002-12-18 klockan 09.42 skrev Alexander Larsson:
> > > erhmm... are there any special reason to re-include in POTFILES.in:
> > >
> > > components/loser/*
> > > components/music/*
> > > components/sample/*
> > > src/nautilus-preferences-dialog.c
> > > src/nautilus-theme-selector.c
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Now I've more then 360 unused string to re-translate :-((
> >
> > No there is no reason to. They were added (without asking) by:
> > 2002-12-16 Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
> >
> > Chris, those files were explicitly removed earlier. You can't just go
> > commit random changes to cvs without asking. I seem to remember unapproved
> > checkins from you causing problems before. Please be more careful in the
> > future and follow the rules.
>
> They should probably be in POTFILES.skip instead. Some of these seems to
> have been explicitly removed from POTFILES.skip by cneumair and placed
> into POTFILES.in instead, which seems like an extraordinary bad thing to
> do without discussion and permission.
>
> That said, there has been many files that were left out of both
> POTFILES.in and POTFILES.skip in nautilus
> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100251) for a long time, and
> it would be nice if those were put in POTFILES.in/POTFILES.skip in a
> correct and approved way.
Why are strings marked for translation if they don't occur in the final
product? I know, that doesn't excuse my behaviour.
Sorry for causing trouble again.
regs,
Chris
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]