Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus Goals
- From: Brian Fahrlander <brian leelumber com>
- To: nautilus-list lists eazel com
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus Goals
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:03:04 -0500
mitch nuclear physics gatech edu wrote:
>
> Wow, I never knew my post would end up leading to such bickering.
> Anyway, while giving Nautilus another try, I wondered about the issue
> of rpms and debs. It would be nice if Nautilus could install rpms and
> debs....
Well, I'm certain it *could* be done, it's probably not wise. Redhat
has a couple of graphical managers, and they all suck: they all assume
you have a _cateory_ in mind, and then deal with it on that level. But
installing an RPM/Deb is so simple, I'd probaby just fall back on some
well-written scripts or something.
Personally, I feel that there are SO many file-types and helper
programs, it's probably best to handle them all the same way: through
the file-type registry. We really ought to fight the creeping
feature-ism that DOS products don't avoid. Seen the Win9x version of
ICQ? Over 6 megs in size, and it's so overburdened with features you
can't do anything with it without a training course or something.
Geeze...
...expect an "ICQ Lite" before long...
Let's not go that route. Let's try to keep it all in one scope.
Sure, hand it off to a seperate handler, but let someone else maintain
THAT code...ya know?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Fahrlander Linux Zealot, Conservative,
Chicago, IL and Stranded Technomad
ICQ 5119262 http://www.kamakiriad.com/aboutme.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source: Share and Enjoy! Shared Source: Look but don't touch!
Live free or die.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]