Re: [Gal-hackers] Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: What about gal && eel into GNOME 2.0?

> I'm probably being a party-pooper (and repetitive to boot), but I
> still don't think libgnomeui should contain "random general purpose
> widgets that happen to be ready after the GTK freeze and before the
> libgnomeui freeze."

  This makes sense.  But on the other hand, I also wish the GTK
maintainers were more open to contributed widgets.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]