Re: [Gal-hackers] Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: What about gal && eel into GNOME 2.0?

> >I'm also interested in a widget like the Evolution's "splash" into
> >gnomelibs, I think that it's "stable", isn't it?
> Not that much. There should be more checks on wether the pixbufs are 
> present or not. Right now if only some images are present, the thing 
> crashes. I don't think that it should be much of a problem to fix that. 
> The other problem is that much of the elements (like the number of 
> icons, and the size of the main splash image) are hard-coded. Well, 
> right now, e-splash is not ready for inclusion in gnome-libs, not as it is.

  Fixing it is pretty trivial though.

  I am all for moving ESplash into gnome-libs, and I am also willing to
do the work to make it more widely usable, if people agree it's a good
addition to libgnomeui.  (I think it is.)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]