Re: [Nautilus-list] Xft Anti-aliasing, Libart antialiasing?
- From: Moses Lei <mlei mtmis com>
- To: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: David Moles <david moles vykor com>, Nautilus list <nautilus-list lists eazel com>, Keith Packard <keithp keithp com>
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Xft Anti-aliasing, Libart antialiasing?
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:16:21 -0500 (EST)
> > I think I'd rather look at something that looks like it looks on paper
> > than something that looks like it's from a computer, if it's going to be
> > blurred either way.
>
> Ah. But the unhinted AA is not what it will look on paper. The paper will
> typically have non-hinted non-aa sharp looking fonts, whereas the unhinted
> aa will have grayscale blurry looking fonts, even though they use the same
> 'ideal' curves instead of slightly modified ones.
Close enough for me :-) As I said, I think different people see things
different ways.
Moses
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]