Re: [Nautilus-list] Xft Anti-aliasing, Libart antialiasing?
- From: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Moses Lei <mlei mtmis com>
- Cc: Nautilus list <nautilus-list lists eazel com>, Keith Packard <keithp suse com>, Raph Levien <raph acm org>
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Xft Anti-aliasing, Libart antialiasing?
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:43:58 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Alex Larsson wrote:
> It looks like the gdkxft font is hinted, but the Nautilus one is rendered
> completely unhinted. You can tell that especially by looking at the i's
> and the l's. In the Xft rendering these are completely non-aa, since the
> hinting made them the grid-aligned. The nautilus one is instead blurry on
> the sides, because the letters are really slightly wider than 1 pixel.
This is in fact the case. From xftglyphs.c:
error = FT_Load_Glyph (font->face, glyphindex, 0/*|FT_LOAD_NO_HINTING */);
while rsvg-ft.c does:
error = FT_Load_Glyph (face, glyph_ix, FT_LOAD_NO_HINTING | FT_LOAD_NO_BITMAP);
/ Alex
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]