Re: [Nautilus-list] RE: Roadmap?
- From: Benedikt Roth <Benedikt Roth gmx net>
- To: Aaron Weber <aaron ximian com>
- Cc: nautilus-list lists eazel com
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] RE: Roadmap?
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:40:01 +0200
On Mon 06, 16:34:32, Aaron Weber wrote:
> Here's my stab at a roadmap, or at least a sketch of one.
>
> Forgive the html mail here, but i'm trying to make this organized
> and attractive to read. And of course please disagree with me!
>
> Milestones:
> Let's arbitrarily choose three Milestones for the next few months.
> We'll call them 1.1, 2.0, and future/post-2.0.
I remember it was decided to use a kernel-like naming scheme, wasn't it?
> 1.1 will consist of new features, bug fixes, and performance
> improvements. It will occur halfway between now and the GNOME 2.0
> release.
So, I think it should be called 1.1 if there are mostly new features or
1.2 if this should be a stable bug fixing release.
> 2.0 will coincide with the GNOME 2.0 release and will involve porting
> to the GNOME 2.0 platform. I don't know what issues this will fix,
> or what bugs it will create. Does anyone else have any ideas?
> Ideally, it would be about 3 months after 1.1, and not have any new
> features, just performance and bug fixes that are a result of the
> port to the better development platform.
>
> Process:
> There are 3 basic kinds of work to do. We will want to move
> the focus from 1 to 3 as we go along.
>
> New Features, including ogg support for the music view, new views
> generally, hacks to existing views and sidebar configurations.
> Work like this may introduce new bugs.
>
> Performance Enhancements: Although performance enhancements will
> likely introduce some bugs, they are not as risky as new-feature
> bugs.
>
> Plain Bugs: Just fixing things, especially bugs that cause a crash or
> hang. No new features. No infrastructure work.
>
> So, now we have to figure out which bugs go where. That'll be fun. I
> guess someone would have to put the milestones into bugzilla before
> people start categorizing them.
>
> A few examples
> of things i'd like to see by 1.1:
>
> Sidebar:
> File manipluation in the tree-view sidebar (http://bugzilla.eazel.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560)
> Terminal view sidebar (7789)
>
> Views:
> Ogg support for music view (1499)
> A few extra views
> Make it easier to add "View as..." items to a menu.
>
> Shell:
> New Terminal in this directory (8290)
> Specify apps needing terminal
> tgz and bz2 archive navigation, extraction, and creation support
>
> Plain Bugs:
> Run a search for "Crash" in bugzilla and see what you get.
> The webview is unstable.
> Drag and Drop causes bg flashing.
This looks good, I agree.
I extended your request-list a bit with stuff I read in the list,
on bugzilla and what just came to my mind.
So this is a list of features I think would be great to have in a not so far
future version of nautilus.
* Bugfixes and speed improvements
* Undo feature
* Su-like feature
* Trash metafile for undeleting
* Selection by regexp/MIME-Type
* Terminal here menu item
* SMB support
* ogg support for the music view
* 'View as photo album'
* View tgz and bz2 archives
* View deb and rpm packages
* HTML previewing
* Font previewing
* Movie previewing
* PDF previewing
* File and Folder operations in the tree view
* Support for multiple (configurable) roots in tree view
(Root, Home, Documents, Network)
* New 'combined-list-and-tree' view
(like mozilla shows file:// or FTP directories)
* Clipboard sidebar tab to DnD items to and from
* More scripts
* More themes
Regards,
Benedikt
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]