Re: [Muine] ANNOUNCE: Muine 0.8.0
- From: Jorn Baayen <jbaayen gnome org>
- To: Tom McLaughlin <tmclaugh sdf lonestar org>
- Cc: muine-list gnome org, Gábor Farkas <gabor z10n net>
- Subject: Re: [Muine] ANNOUNCE: Muine 0.8.0
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:29:31 +0100
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 00:01 -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 20:16 +0100, Jorn Baayen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 19:46 +0100, G�r Farkas wrote:
> > > Jorn Baayen wrote:
> > >
> > > btw. 'once we have proper inotify support'...what's needed? i assume an
> > > inotify-enabled kernel (shouldn't be hard to have one), and? does mono
> > > support inotify already? will muine be needed to have special support
> > > for inotify, or it happens automatically via some listeners?
> > I believe gnome-vfs has inotify support already. So all we need is
> > working gnome-vfs bindings. They are actually pretty much there already,
> > we're just waiting for a new mono 1.0.x release, which will have a
> > bugfix which will make the gnome-vfs bindings in gtk# work.
> > Jorn
> Jorn, can you just clarify for me, is inotify support going to be
> implemented directly in Muine (like with Beagle which I believe
> interacts directly with inotify) or is it being included in gnome-vfs or
> Mono and Muine will interface with inotify through those libraries?
> Inotify is Linux specific and a problem for FreeBSD. I have a patch for
> Beagle to use something similar provided by FreeBSD which was written by
> someone else. I'm just waiting to get up to speed with C# (going slow
> but I should be up to speed soon :-/) to include support for FreeBSD. I
> just want to know where I'm going to be patching. Thanks.
Indirectly through gnome-vfs is the plan.
] [Thread Prev