On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 14:08 +0200, Quim Gil wrote: > The trap of keeping the GNOME identity tied to a specific technology > (GTK+) as a best replacement for a lack of identity and vision (*). > This approach worked during the first decade of GNOME, I just wonder > whether it can be kept for the mobile decade. I was meaning to bring this point up over the weekend as part of the Clutter inclusion question. During the meeting at GUADEC there was a general consensus that: a) Clutter should be added to GNOME Mobile b) The best way of determining if something can be considered to be using "GNOME Mobile" -- given the flexibility and freedom inherent in the stack -- would be to say "uses either Clutter or GTK+". So, do we still agree that Clutter should sit alongside GTK+ in the GNOME Mobile 2.26 diagram, as an optional/complementary user interface library? Devices can use just GTK+ and be GNOME Mobile (Vernier, current Maemo), or have a primarily GTK+ interface with Clutter parts and be GNOME Mobile (Ubuntu Mobile, Maemo Fremantle I imagine), or be purely Clutter and still be GNOME Mobile (nothing here yet). Ross -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part