Re: hildon gnome org

[Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>]

On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 01:01 +0300, Carlos Guerreiro wrote:
> 
> Since then, a lot of effort has been put on improving Hildon's
> alignment with gtk+ and GNOME by aggressively reducing our
> patch against gtk+ and Hildon's dependencies on Maemo specifics.

This is all very interesting.  In the long run, what features do you see
that have to live in Hildon and cannot be moved to current GNOME
platform libraries?  Given that there are bugs/proposals to add
GtkApplication classes and similar efforts, what is it in Hildon that
doesn't have a future in Gtk+?

Thanks,


-- 
behdad
http://behdad.org/

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
 Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
        -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759