Re: [gnome.org #12003] [RENEWAL] Application received from John Palmieri (john.j5.palmieri AT gmail.com)

["john palmieri via RT" <membership-applications gnome org>]

So you want to make this personal?  I have only been commenting on the
policy but now you are offended?  I'm sorry but there is a major
problem here.  I'm not the only one who has had this issue over the
years.  It seems that it is known that foundation e-mails tend to go
to spam filters as evidenced by the election board's advice that you
look in your spam folder.  I was on the board for a year and a half
and these issues were never brought up to the board.  These are
technical issues that can be addressed and fixed.  They are things
that once fixed would constitute much less work on your part.

I'm sorry if your feelings are more paramount then the proper running
of an election.  I will be contesting the election if this not
addressed.  Things I want to know are how many people were denied
votes this time around because of delayed registration and who are the
people on the membership board and the election board.

--
John

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Tobias Mueller <muelli cryptobitch de> wrote:
> Heya,
>
> On 03.06.2011 00:53, john palmieri via RT wrote:
> > Seems pretty unfair
> As I value fairness quite a lot I find some offense in your statement.
> Let me say that I find it quite unfair to cause us work at this busy
> stage where you probably got an email once your membership was about to
> expire, once the elections were about to be announced and *even a
> personal email reminding you* that you have to renew in order to vote.
>
> So I'd say we have done pretty much (even too much babysitting for my
> taste). You are welcome to suggest improvements and help making them happen.
>
> Cheers,
> ÂTobi


----------------------------------------------------
This message was sent via GNOME.org Request Tracker.