Re: Updates for membership applications!

[Ghee Teo <Ghee Teo Sun COM>]

Hi Vincent,

        Thank you for making known your view on the list of applicants.
I came up with the exact approved list as yours. Ramesh Kumar is the 
only one I denied as his works is far too generic and unclear is it 
contributing to GNOME in any form (solely based on the application 
information).I have checked others based on Google searches.

        I will indeed add in a small apology as you suggested ;)

-Ghee


Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:41:29 +0100, Ghee Teo a ecrit :
>
>
> > Hi
> >         I guess I was having my winter hibernation ;)
> > Will start doing something this week.
>
>
> Cool ;-)
>
> Let's discuss the applications we did not review. Here are my first
> impressions:
>
>   * 373 Gael Chamoulaud: I'd say "approved", but I know him a bit. Maybe
> we should ask DV what he thinks.
>
>   * 374 Dodji Seketeli: need to contact DV to know what he thinks about
> him, but should be ok.
>
>   * 375 Yuriy Syrota: translator. Should be ok after having verified.
>
>   * 376 Daniel German: was previously a member => "approved".
>
>   * 377 Fernando Herrera de las Heras: bug-buddy maintainer =>
> "approved".
>
>   * 378 Ramesh Kumar: well, there's nothing clear in his application. We
> need to contact him to have more informations.
>
>   * 379 Paul Duffy: translator. Should be ok after having verified.
>
>   * 380 Sanlig Badral: translator. Should be ok after having verified.
>
>   * 381 Miloslav Trmac: translator. Should be ok after having verified.
>
> What do you all feel about those applications ?
>
> I suggest we add a small sentence like "Sorry for being so long in
> processing your application" for the old ones (those that we received in
> February/March). Good idea or not ?
>
> Vincent


--
Thanks,

Ghee Teo