Re: Replace/RE/All = seg-error !?

[chris glur <crglur gmail com>]

Why didn't I get a reply to this query:
-> mc -> F4 -> Replace
---
Replace using RegExp: \[[0-9]+\]
  with <space>
---
I haven't had seg-errors lately, with small files.
And what about the spell check?
Doesn't anybody ever use it.
== Chris Glur.

On 10/10/13, chris glur <crglur gmail com> wrote:
> I need to clean-up text fetched by lynx/links, by
> removing the numbered links.
> Eg.     * 2.4 [11]What is the Challenge of the TUNES Project?
>      * 2.5  [12]Couldn't  TUNES  be  just a normal application running
> ===
> should automatically replace both:
> "[11]" and "[12]". So using Edit/Replace with the
> RE facility, I use: \[[0-9]*\]
> meaning:
> \[ = an open bracket
> [0-9] = any element of the set "0" thru "9"
> * = zero or more times-repeated
> \] = closing bracket.
> It usually works. But sometimes I get <seg error>.
> That seems to be on bigger files.
> And it seems that if it seg-errors ONCE, it will
> also seg-error on the next/different file.
>
> BTW, does the new version still have bad-arrow-keys
> after exiting <spell check> ?
>
> == TIA.