Re: Update.


...but I'm not sure if I'd call it better written. It still uses old
"url" method, which is totaly unsuitable for something that wants to
look like filesystem. (Or not? It is not easy to check for that)

It is not more well-written than mc-vfs. To me it seems mc-vfs is better
designed, modulo it is not threaded... Esp. gnome-vfs' uri parsing scheme
and uri-data-structures sucks big time (I have submitted a patch for
cleaning up this a bit at least some time ago, but it never got applied
due to hurry to get nautilus out).

Can I see that patch? Yes, uri's suck when it comes to looking like

The best software in life is free (not shareware)!              Pavel
GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]