Re: Glib or no glib - we need a decision

* Slava Zanko <slavazanko gmail com> schrieb:


> What I mean: need to create some wrapper... like my first step 
> to this in

Inspired by your idea, I've started writing some minimalistic
helper library (./mhl/* -> "micro helper library") which actually
just provides a bunch of macros and inlines.

Meanwhile I've moved the whole memory management, string handling
and even hashtable handling (using libhash) there. 

> For now, wrapper may have #define'd via pseudo-functions... but in
> future (if someone from 'contra' want) will realize own library (call it
> as you want: mcglib, mccore,,...), and will add in
> ./ option '--without-glib'

Yes, that would be easy. But as I already wrote own (glib-free) 
implementations for that stuff, I doubt why we should glib at all ;-o

 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service -
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]