Re: glib or not glib?

From: Slava Zanko <slavazanko gmail com>
To: mc devel <mc-devel gnome org>
Subject: Re: glib or not glib?
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:13:26 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Roland Illig wrote:
>> glib or not glib?
> I want to keep it.
+1

In source code some functions (part of functions) is a duplicate of
glib-functional... I think, we need to review source code for more using
of glib functions...

BTW, is we need to keep compatibility with glib-1.2?

WBR, Slavaz.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAklknGYACgkQb3oGR6aVLpqeQQCeL+PGxPCKK3ZcoQbfxOBP1yMr
YSEAnjNNRYbBeeIzceKblMhbmCi6V40t
=2Q//
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- [Midnight Commander] #150: [PATCH] More FHS-compliant install directories
  - From: Ticket System
- Re: [Midnight Commander] #150: [PATCH] More FHS-compliant install directories
  - From: Ticket System
- Re: [Midnight Commander] #150: [PATCH] More FHS-compliant install directories
  - From: Enrico Weigelt
- glib or not glib? (was: Re: [Midnight Commander] #150: [PATCH] More FHS-compliant install directories)
  - From: Andrew Borodin
- Re: glib or not glib?
  - From: Roland Illig

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]