Re: glib or not glib? (was: Re: [Midnight Commander] #150: [PATCH] More FHS-compliant install directories)
- From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt metux de>
- To: mc-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: glib or not glib? (was: Re: [Midnight Commander] #150: [PATCH] More FHS-compliant install directories)
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:11:56 +0100
* Andrew Borodin <aborodin vmail ru> schrieb:
Hi,
> > First tiny step to get rid if glib.
>
> It's very strange. Do you think than mc must be free of glib?
Yes, because glib is a fat blob we don't really need (the few
things we currently use can be easily done w/ a bunch of
macros or inline's).
Isn't it rather absurd to maintain an stripped-down branch of
slang for embedded systems, but at the same time import glib ? ;-O
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]