Hey, As there is currently no real written down workflow for patches I would like to suggest the following: - Every patch which should be applied to the git should be attached to a bugreport in our ticketsystem. There should be for each patch a own ticket so that we have a good overview. - Every patch that is in the ticket system must be approved by two devs in order to get applied again the working branch (master). - If someone dislikes a patch he should either contact the author of the patch in order to get a updated version (which should again be added to the same bugreport) or fix it himself. In both cases again two developers should give their okay to this patch. This system makes it possible that everytime a patch should be applied to mc at least three people had a look on it (the submitter and two other developers). As every comment in the ticketsystem from trac is send to the mailinglist it should be possible to track things while reading the mailinglist. A feature I will add in some time is that you can answer to the ticketmails and the automatically get added to the ticketsystem of trac, but this doesn't work right now. What do you think? Is this workflow for patches okay? If yes I would write this down somewhere in the wiki in order to make it official. -- . '' ` . Patrick Winnertz <winnie debian org> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~winnie - http://www.der-winnie.de `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.