Re: When will mc-4.6.2 be released?
- From: Marcel Pol <mpol gmx net>
- To: MC Devel <mc-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: When will mc-4.6.2 be released?
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:19:35 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 14:25, Marcel Pol wrote:
|
|>A small problem that comes from that is that the utf8 patches are
|>developed against head now. There are a few rejects when applying to
|>current 4.6.1. Since I'm no C coder I'm not able to upgrade the Mandrake
|>package to current 4.6.1, and I'd rather not touch head.
|
|
| That is a very bad development. We want these patches to be used
| downstream for 4.6.1. For post 4.6.1 we hope to implement support for
| multibyte character sets by wrapping relevant functions.
|
| Jindrich, I have asked you repeatedly to revert from the use of HEAD for
| the pre 4.6.1 releases. Please, please, please could you use a PRE
| tarball for the development rpms for Fedora Core and Red Hat Enterprise
| Linux? I've put a lot of effort to get these patches from Red Hat (Jakub
| Jelinek) and SuSE (Vladimir Nadvornik) synchronized and I would hate it
| to see that effort wasted. Thanks.
I'm sorry, it turns out I was partly wrong here. The devel tree for
Fedora4 has a package from cvs head, while updates for Fedora3 hold a
4.6.1-pre3 package with an utf8 patch that applies cleanly against it.
Sorry for any confusion.
- --
Marcel Pol
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCDgJnMgeuL0xhZZ4RAkcsAJ4uR0Ko9BQGO5jjSLZB53EokygC+ACeJpcd
K4Bq2ElBG7Yx3uWxZYSiKys=
=rQiX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]