Re: Is anyone reviewing patches ?

[Roland Illig <roland illig gmx de>]

Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00005.html

Rejected because it is too complicated without proper support for 
extended character sets.

> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00021.html

I like this patch.

> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00035.html

There are various other places where canonicalize_pathname() is used. 
That means that ftp paths could be canonicalized wrongly after being 
displayed. I would suggest to add a parameter fold_dotdot to 
canonicalize_pathname() to mark the places where we actually want this. 
This also eliminates the code duplication for the two "for"-loops.

> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00043.html

I didn't look at it too closely, but I like it. I would rather extend it 
to the whole Midnight Commander so that you can redefine the keys to 
whatever you like.

Roland