Re: Re[2]: strip_passwd partial commit
- From: Jindrich Novy <jnovy redhat com>
- To: "Pavel Shirshov (pchel)" <me pavelsh pp ru>
- Cc: MC Devel <mc-devel gnome org>, Leonard den Ottolander <leonard den ottolander nl>
- Subject: Re: Re[2]: strip_passwd partial commit
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:23:47 +0100
Hello Pavel,
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 07:22, Pavel Shirshov (pchel) wrote:
> I got an output
> -----------------------------------------------------
> genie# ./mc
> pavelsh test ru:pass test your domain/path/to/file
> pavelsh test ru@test.your.domain
> pavelsh test ru:pass test your domain/path/to/file
> -------------------------
> pavelsh:pass test your domain/path/to/file
> pavelsh test your domain
> pavelsh test your domain/path/to/file
> -------------------------
> pavelsh test ru:pass test your domain/
> pavelsh test ru@test.your.domain
> pavelsh test ru:pass test your domain/
> -------------------------
> pavelsh test ru:pass test your domain/path/to/file/
> pavelsh test ru@test.your.domain
> pavelsh test ru:pass test your domain/path/to/file/
> -------------------------
Please note that the test case is valid only for URL present in string
txt2:
> pavelsh:pass test your domain/path/to/file
> pavelsh test your domain
> pavelsh test your domain/path/to/file
where the strip_password_new() behaves as it should (last line).
The rest of testing URLs are malformed, because they're not RFC-1738
compliant. So they *shouldn't* be used as URLs. Please see
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1738.html section 3.1.
However, from the test case txt2 it's apparent the bug in the original
strip_password().
greetings,
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy <jnovy redhat com>, http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]