- From: Egil Moeller <redhog mandrakesoft com>
- To: Pavel Machek <pavel suse cz>
- Cc: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>, <mc-devel gnome org>, <mc gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Update.
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:28:15 -0400 (EDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> ...but I'm not sure if I'd call it better written. It still uses old
> "url" method, which is totaly unsuitable for something that wants to
> look like filesystem. (Or not? It is not easy to check for that)
It is not more well-written than mc-vfs. To me it seems mc-vfs is better
designed, modulo it is not threaded... Esp. gnome-vfs' uri parsing scheme
and uri-data-structures sucks big time (I have submitted a patch for
cleaning up this a bit at least some time ago, but it never got applied
due to hurry to get nautilus out).
GPG Public key: http://mini.dhs.org/PGP%20Public%20key.asc
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.1 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
] [Thread Prev