Re: What keywords would you use for GNOME?
- From: "Lefty (石鏡 )" <lefty shugendo org>
- To: Stormy Peters <stormy gnome org>, <07721 ipam pt>
- Cc: marketing-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: What keywords would you use for GNOME?
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:55:33 -0800
I have no idea why I¹m doing this, actually?pure grandmotherly kindness or
something, perhaps?but the place to start for this sort of thing is Google¹s
own Keyword tool for AdWords.
https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal
Full disclosure: I sent this from my Macintosh, using Entourage, on OS X.
Evolution is _still_ buggy and slow. Deal with it. Too bad no one around
apparently knows much about SEO. Have fun, I'm off to FOSDEM day after
tomorrow!
On 2/1/10 9:23 AM, "Stormy Peters" <stormy gnome org> wrote:
> Nelson,
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:34 AM, <07721 ipam pt> wrote:
>>
>> I would suggest that we should prioritize the development of tools to allow
>> us
>> to build a database with the most information we can retrieve from GNOME
>> Users,
>> and just like in normal corporate marketing build and segment the ranks of
>> our
>> users by Operative System, age, gender, nationality, etc etc. The more we
>> know
>> about people who use GNOME for several purposes (home, education,
>> development,
>> etc) the more accurate we can deploy new tools, new services, etc, and
>> eventually position us with a clear thought on how users see us and what they
>> expect. Having such a background would actually allow us to answer questions
>> like this ones in a much more accurate way.
>>
>
> I agree that information would be great to have and I'm open to any ways to
> collect it.
>
> In the meantime, we have $330/day of free advertising to use so we are going
> to have to make some guesses.
>
> I'm open to any keyword/ad combinations people would like to try. We can check
> on them once a week for a while.
>
> FYI, to one of the points in Claus' email. We had to have two ads per adgroup
> in order to get approved. So it's about more than testing ads, it's actually
> one of the requirements.
>
> Stormy
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]