Re: Release notes and wgo revamp

[Claus Schwarm <c schwarm gmx net>]

On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 00:04:17 +0200
"Quim Gil" <quimgil gmail com> wrote:

> There is a lot of work to do and we don't seem to progress much (or at
> least not as much as we need to deliver something good by March 14th)
> 
> We need to be clever reciclyng as much work as possible. Here is a
> proposal to have something ready that is better than the current
> website and is also easily extensible to continue working on the 15th
> onwards.
> 
 [...]
> 
> Does this plan make sense? Ideas?
> 

Hi!

If I understand correctly, you want to move WGO to the new system
althought you didn't convert any of the old content yet. I wonder
whether this is a sensible appoach.

For example, what happens to the old URLs that other pages and sites
link to? Didn't we say the revamp should not break stuff if possible?

Also, I don't understand what you mean by keeping the release notes
"simple and create part of their content as GNOME Products pages".

Maybe, it's better to look straight at the facts: Moving to the Plone
system now will just make things worse. Try doing it for 2.20


Cheers,
Claus