I believe "Our current hacky system" is not an option. The work that implies to make the current system match the requirements is probably much bigger than picking the most appropriate CMS and tune it to our needs (and contribute the improvements to the project). For the current release the critical point, I think, is what we expect to do with translations. As said, fitting all the requirements now is pretty difficult for any CMS, also for the current system. I expect a negotiation, and it would be good to have "authorised negotiators" from the translators team. Anyone here? Is Danilo our man or who? The decision must be made also having in mind the context for next releases. Aspects as user integration with other web tools we are using, integration of eCommerce/donation system and CRM tool are also relevant. El dl 24 de 07 del 2006 a les 10:48 +0200, en/na Murray Cumming va escriure: > Hopefully "none of these CMSs" (or "Our current hacky system"), is an > option. It should be considered in case even the best CMS is not good > enough , or is unlikely to ever meet our needs. "ever" is a tricky term in the context of programming. ;) -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://guadec.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aix=F2?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=E9s?= una part d'un missatge, signada digitalment