We want www.gnome.org/* to be a small, cool, updated and translated bunch of pages describing the very best of GNOME and linking properly to the rest. This could be a definition of what we want wgo to be. As for today we can't assure these quality standards for the www.gnome.org/projects/* pages. Nor we want to include all that information under the wgo partition, I think. Having/planning partitions for support, news, foundation, etc, it makes sense to have an own partition for projects. I don't see the relation between a subdomain and a way to death, our most alive GNOME sites are subdomains, and some project pages under www.gnome.org/projects/* are almost dead. We also have exceptions such as http://balsa.gnome.org ( http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/GnomeSubsites updated again, thanks Guilherme for providing the complete list of registered subdomains). The change from wgo/projects/* to projects.gnome.org/* is conceptual and cosmetic, it would not affect anything in the backend. What to do with the projects pages will be still an issue to be defined, but at least it won't be in the middle of the 2.16 wgo revamp. I've added a 2.18 potential goal to http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Goals : * Common policies and standard web host offer to all GNOME projects. El dc 19 de 07 del 2006 a les 11:34 +1000, en/na Jeff Waugh va escriure: > <quote who="Quim Gil"> > Before making this decision, please figure out what we want 'project pages' > to achieve, and make the decision based on that. Death by subdomain is not > something I want to see happen with the GNOME web effort (I've been staving > it off for a while now). > > - Jeff > > -- > linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ > > "Spend your 'different points' wisely." - Havoc Pennington -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://guadec.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aix=F2?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=E9s?= una part d'un missatge, signada digitalment