Hi Amazigh, thanks for bringing your thoughts to the wgo revamp. On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 13:17 +0200, AMAZIGH Aneglus wrote: > Hi ! > > I'm a little lost in this discussion. We don't want lost energies. I recommend you to pick one (and just one) task at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/DevelopmentTimeline and push it until we get to agreed conclusions and real results. You can take a task without responsible or you can help in a task with a responsible assigned. > The problem is that now the site is These points have already been found and put in positive. See "Goals" and "Points to remember" at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/ > let's list all gnome websites or part of the gnome website : Thank you! This is a big part of the work Thomas Wood needs to do for the *.gnome.org partitioning draft. I'm CCing him, just in case he didn't receive your previous post. > don't forget that a guy is working on library.gnome.org for SoC 2006 [4] He is following the wgo revamp and we are following his steps. Remember though that here_and_now we are concentrating efforts on the www.gnome.org revamp, not the whole *gnome.org websites redesign. This will be a challenge for the next release cycle. > Normal Users (NU) want to See http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/UseCases and feel free to improve them. About the rest of (interesting) ideas you are suggesting, I recommend you to prioritize those you think that should go to wgo (and not other *go subsites) and push them with reasoning and detail. > Let's describe the website of an application: This is a complete different thread. Post-september in our timeline, although you can choose to push this topic, since one day or another we will need to go back to it. > Another problem : forum/ML/news//: we should be able to provide all at > -- the same time -- Another separate thread. We are not planning these services for wgo, so there is no need for immediate discussion. > Then we could provide blogs (and photo sharing), why ? Same thing > and why not a start page [3], a webmail what else ? :) Same thing, although there might be a relation between wgo and the start page. > wgo goals should be 'one banner' 'one password' so we must build > bridges between all the part of the websites or build all the website > over the same framework. Agreed. This is a policy. :) > I hope I made my point of view plain. Mmmm yes, but I hope I also made mine asking you to concentrate in one aspect (ok, or maybe two) in order to help efficiently to the wgo revamp. After months/years of discussion we are now in full development process, vague discussions and multithread emails have the risk to be left behind even if containing good stuff. -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://guadec.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part